Rivers State Activists Challenge RSIEC Appointments Under Emergency Rule in Court
This post has already been read 2289 times!
A heated legal battle is unfolding in Rivers State as activists and concerned citizens challenge federal appointments to the Rivers State Independent Electoral Commission (RSIEC). The lawsuit, filed at the Federal High Court in Port Harcourt, seeks to block confirmation of nominees sent by the Sole Administrator of Rivers State, Vice Admiral Ibok-Ete Ibas.
The plaintiffs, including the Incorporated Trustees of Peoples Life Improvement Foundation, HRM Precious Elekima, and Hon. Inanna Wright Harry, argue that these appointments violate the constitution and could undermine the integrity of the upcoming local government elections.
Rivers State had already established its electoral commission under the leadership of retired Justice Adolphus Enebeli, with elections scheduled for August 9, 2025.
However, the federal government’s declaration of a state of emergency in March led to governance changes that plaintiffs claim exceed legal authority.
At the core of the dispute is whether the Senate President, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, and the National Assembly have the authority to approve electoral commission appointments under emergency rule, bypassing standard legislative oversight.
The plaintiffs have urged the court to issue an injunction to halt the confirmation process, warning that proceeding with the appointments could severely impact the credibility of Rivers State’s electoral system and disenfranchise voters.
Legal analysts highlight the constitutional significance of the case, noting that it may set a precedent for federal intervention in state governance. Plaintiffs reference key Supreme Court rulings to support their claims, arguing that judicial intervention is necessary to prevent undue federal influence over state electoral matters.
“The federal government’s actions, particularly the appointments made by the Sole Administrator, represent an overreach of executive power,” stated Ebere R. Ugwuja, lead counsel for the plaintiffs. “Confirming nominees while legal challenges remain unresolved would compromise the separation of powers and democratic integrity.”
Despite formal protest letters sent to Senate leadership on May 13, reports indicate that the confirmation process is still moving forward. Activists warn that such actions could erode judicial authority and threaten democratic governance in the state.
As court proceedings continue, the case’s outcome could have lasting effects on federal-state relations in Nigeria. If the court sides with the plaintiffs, it may reaffirm limitations on federal control during state emergencies. Conversely, a ruling favoring the federal government could expand executive powers in crisis situations.
With Rivers State caught in a political and legal storm, all eyes remain on the judiciary as the battle over electoral appointments intensifies. Court hearings are expected in the coming weeks, with stakeholders awaiting a critical decision that could shape the future of governance in the state.
